Below is the agenda and notes for the January 2023 Utah MUG meeting. The meeting agenda and notes can also be viewed here
Agenda
-
Welcome & Introductions (~15min)
-
Utah MUG Vision and Objectives (~10 min)
- Purpose: work together in an atmosphere of mutual respect and collaboration to inform, improve, and promote the science, art, and application of travel demand forecasting throughout the state of Utah
- Draft Vision and Objectives document here.
-
What MUG discusses and does not discuss (~5 min)
- Types of Models Discussed
Land Use Models Travel Demand Models Other Models Real Estate Market Model (REMM) used by MAG & WFRC Utah Statewide Travel Model (USTM) Bike Model Socioeconomic Allocation Model (spreadsheet model) used by UDOT, Cache MPO & Dixie MPO Including Subarea Import (Snapping) Model Access to Opportunity (ATO) Model Wasatch Front Travel Demand Model STOPS Cache Travel Demand Model Dixie Travel Demand Model Summit-Wasatch Travel Demand Model Iron County Travel Demand Model - Types of Models Not Discussed
- Microsimulation models
- Air quality models
-
Meeting format and engagement (~5 min)
- MUG committee will send an agenda the month before the meeting asking for presentation topics/discussion items. Everyone is welcome to submit: agencies, consultants, universities.
- Meeting frequency: quarterly (January, April, July, October).
- Meeting time: Tuesday at 10am.
-
Presentations (~40 min)
- Utah Travel Demand Models (Agencies)
- “Tooele Midvalley Highway EA Travel Modeling” by Avenue Consultants.
-
UTRAC Research Topics (~10 min)
- Travel demand model accuracy evaluation
- Using NCHRP Report 934 as a guide, assess the accuracy of Utah’s historic travel demand model forecasts.
- Socioeconomic data in TDM
- Evaluate current socioeconomic data development methods and explore options for improvement. Includes all Utah TDMs (including USTM) except for the WFRC/MAG model.
- Speed data accuracy in travel demand model
- Assessment of how accurate speeds are for various area types and functional types in Utah’s travel demand models.
- Telecommute
- Travel demand model accuracy evaluation
-
Suggestion Box: please enter any suggestions here.
Notes
- Proposed to have different topics for each meeting. For example, focus one meeting on data, another on work in other states, another on national resources like NCHRP reports.
- Discussion about meeting frequency
- Given all the topics, it may be valuable to meet every two months.
- Some would like more frequent meetings.
- Others expressed concern with too frequent meetings because we are all very busy.
- Consultants expressed their time limitations.
- Decided to start the meetings on a quarterly basis and see how it goes from there.
- Discussion: would our own conference be of interest?
- Some think it would be valuable.
- Have a stronger presence in existing groups (ITE, Utah Transportation Conference, others).
- Have training sessions during an existing conference.
- Desire to have a newsletter or a non-meeting way of sharing knowledge (slack, others).
- Proposed to use ITE meetings as a forum for longer presentations (conference March 21st).